当前位置:考试网  > 试卷库  > 外语类  > 雅思  > 写作  >  An increasing number of museums tend to charge admission fees from tourists rather than providing service free of charge. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
试题预览

An increasing number of museums tend to charge admission fees from tourists rather than providing service free of charge. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

更新时间:2024-05-03 20:53:13
收藏
纠错
正确答案:

In many countries, museums used to be free for visitors to enter. But recently, admission fee is introduced due to a cut in funding from the government.

There are reasons for such proposal. Firstly, charging admission keeps a museum run healthily because it provides museums some funding for maintenance and expansion. As we generally know, building a museum with special characters and functions costs substantially more money than an ordinary residential building. Operation spending including security, staff salary and enriching the collections also need constant financial support. If all this cost has to come from taxation, that would be unfair to some taxpayers who do not visit museums at all. Also charging admission can compensate publicly funded museums for cuts in subsidy granted by the government and do not drop their service quality and security. Meanwhile this would not threaten other independent competitors which rely on their income from entry fees.

However, some people disagree with charging entry because they are convinced of some adverse impacts on the society. It is true that a museum is a venue about learning and enjoying as well. It is the access to vivid presentation of knowledge and local culture and history, and charging admission would decrease the number of visits, hence undermining the inspiration for knowledge and cultural heritage preservation and transmission. Another concern about charging admission of a museum is that a museum, as an important educational resource, may lose its educational function because some students in a disadvantaged position would be deprived of a museum tour.

In conclusion, although free access to a museum can promote culture and education, it leads to financial pressure on a museum. Accordingly students should be given a preference treatment and this can be effective with the government’s constant funding for student museum visit. Adults should be charged of admission to a museum. A virtual museum can be another promising option for those less well-off because it is much cheaper to build and run, and therefore can be provided free.

答案解析:

暂无解析

你可能感兴趣的试题

肺表面具有活性物质,可以保持肺泡表面张力,保证肺泡结构稳定性,主要由()

在我国逻辑哲学的研究刚刚起步时,人们致力于引进、学习西方逻辑哲学理论。因此,部分学者产生一种________,似乎西方逻辑哲学的理论就是逻辑哲学的唯一真理。他们对待西方逻辑哲学理论,不是采取批判的态度,去其糟粕,取其精华,并以之作为构建我国逻辑哲学的素材,而是全盘照搬,________。

言语理解与表达/片段阅读,与传统出版时代一样,出版社在数字出版时代依然是一个产品提供商、服务提供商的角色。但数字出版时代读者的需求日益个性化,出版社要想生存,就必须对读者的需求进行更细致的分析,出版更能满足读者需求的图书,提供更多样的产品。这段文字意在强调()。

微循环是指循环系统中()

肺循环起于()

热门试题 更多>
试题分类: 公共关系案例
试题分类: 传播学概论
原告:某装饰工程有限公司 被告:黄某、郑某、林某(方草地餐饮有限责任公司的三个股东) 诉讼请求: ①请求法院判决三被告履行对方草地餐饮有限责任公司的清算义务。 ②请求法院判决三被告与方草地餐饮有限责任公司一起承担偿还原告债权的连带责任。原告与方草地餐饮有限责任公司签订了“建设工程施工合同”,约定由原告为方草地餐饮公司进行室内装潢,原告完成施工任务并经被告所属公司验收合格后交付使用,但被告所属公司却一直未支付其应支付的工程款130万元;后餐饮公司因违法经营而被工商局吊销营业执照,但未清算,致使原告公司债权迟迟不能实现。原告认为,三被告系债务人公司股东,在该有限责任公司被吊销执照后负有清算义务,但却未尽法定义务,被告不尽法定义务的行为是导致其债权不能实现的原因。故提出以上诉请。 现经法院查明: ①方草地餐饮有限责任公司由黄某、郑某和林某三人共同发起设立。黄某以自有商铺作价200万元出资,郑某以实物作价50万元出资,林某以150万元货币出资。现经法院委托有关中介机构评估确认,黄某的出资明显不实,商铺实际价值只有100万元。 ②方草地餐饮有限责任公司拖欠原告130万元工程款属实。 问: (1)原告关于有限责任公司被吊销执照后,其股东负有清算义务的主张是否有依据?为什么? (2)被告黄某、郑某、林某是否应该对公司该笔债务负连带责任?为什么? (3)你认为该案应如何处理?
试题分类: 公司法
试题分类: 公共关系案例